01 December 2011

Are Certain Academic Historians Lying Or Stupid?

I've pointed out numerous times that the current administration embraces and promotes, when it can, Marxist ideology. Of course, the smartest folks in the room - certain academic historians - have a hissy-fit and roll their eyes. I wonder, are they that stupid or are they just lying?

Anyway, here's more evidence of Marxist/Communist influence within the current administration. One of the White House's most frequent visitors, Andy Stern, openly suggests (in the WSJ no less) that Communist China's system is superior to ours:

The conservative-preferred, free-market fundamentalist, shareholder-only model-so successful in the 20th century-is being thrown onto the trash heap of history in the 21st century...

American liberals Marxists are quite confident citing Communism as their end game. Also, note some of the buzz words Stern strategically chose for his piece: "fundamentalist." Of course, Stern is wrong about history, as are many of the smartest in the room types - historians who should know better. Numbers and the evidence tell the story. Liars are what end up being thrown onto the trash heap of history. More here at the American Spectator.


Brock Townsend said...

They are most certainly Marxist and will use any means available to try it again. Maybe they will only have to kill 50 million this time.......

"And Now, After Sending Our Best Young Men To Die On distant battlefields fighting Communism, we may simply vote a Marxist into our highest office."
23 July 2008
10/'67 - 5/'69 USARV, 6/'69 - 09/'71 OICC/RVN+, 06/'73 - 25/04/'75 DAO, US Embassy RVN

Posted earlier.

Chaps said...

"Are certain academic historians lying or stupid?" Yes.

Richard G. Williams, Jr. said...

Chaps - funny.